
Wang Hui's big contribution to English, so far
I made some comments earlier this year on my efforts to read the essays in The End of the Revolution by Wang Hui. I found him a bold and original thinker with a typically challenging intellectual writing style. I just want to note here that I have discovered from the China Beat, a (usually quite boring) China studies blog, that Wang Hui is now the subject of a high-profile plagiarism case. Historian Peter Zarrow defends Professor Wang, albeit in the usual ambivalent way that serves first and foremost to defend his American institutions, as if China's first priority should be to move towards our version of the professionalization of the field. I felt a strong repugnance for this reasoning, because American graduate and professional study of history seems to me to be facing far too many internal crises to recommend itself to any nation-state. If there is any substance to Zarrow's defense, it is in a vague feeling about the communicative effects of Wang Hui's accusation:...judging from my browsing of the internet, I do not want to see web lynching or a media circus. There is something truly weird about many of the attacks.Is Zarrow seeing "web lynching" on the internet? What does that look like? Or is he afraid that he will see it soon, judging from his browsing? What does he mean by "weird"? (In my experience, Chinese prose on the internet is almost always "weird," and if not, that's also "weird.")
As a member of a China-studies email list I am on said in the opening reply to Zarrow, it might have been better for Zarrow not to participate at all in this affair, or else if he had wanted to be useful he could have signed onto an open letter to CASS requesting "an open, transparent and impartial investigation" into the affair. I note this because it's a nice example of the kind of intercultural pitfall one faces as an American scholar who wishes to hold a conversation between two extremely complex institutions and traditions. It's no wonder that so often our replies to problems are -- silence. I don't want to encourage silence, but rather sticking to a harsh, cold realism. Just the facts ma'am. Zarrow did make a mistake by acting in a case when he didn't have all the facts, only a sense that something in it was "weird."
Read more...